What Kohlss Stores Are Closing 2024 Key Factors Drivers

Published

Table of Contents

Kohl’s recent wave of store closures reflects a strategic pivot amid evolving retail dynamics, reshaping its physical footprint while balancing financial recovery and shifting consumer preferences. As the department store chain accelerates its "Kohl’s 2.0" transformation—prioritizing e-commerce integration, private-label expansion, and high-performance locations—hundreds of underperforming stores face shutdowns. These closures, concentrated in regions grappling with declining foot traffic and rising occupancy costs, underscore broader industry trends where brick-and-mortar retailers must adapt or risk obsolescence. The decisions ripple through local economies, impacting employees, small businesses, and communities reliant on these anchor stores, while forcing competitors like JCPenney and Macy’s to recalibrate their own strategies in an increasingly digital-first marketplace.

The 2023–2024 closure announcements reveal a deliberate focus on consolidating Kohl’s presence in high-traffic areas, often phasing out smaller off-mall locations in favor of larger, more versatile formats. Financial pressures—including debt restructuring efforts and the need to reduce occupancy expenses—further accelerate these changes, as the retailer navigates a delicate balance between cost-cutting and maintaining brand relevance. Meanwhile, customer behavior shifts, from surging online orders to heightened competition from Amazon and Walmart, compound the urgency for Kohl’s to redefine its physical retail strategy. Understanding these closures requires examining not only the logistics of store shutdowns but also the broader implications for retail’s future.

what kohl's stores are closing

Kohl’s 2023–2024 Store Closures: Locations, Patterns, and Strategic Context

Kohl’s Corporation has accelerated its retail footprint optimization in 2023–2024, announcing a series of store closures as part of its broader restructuring strategy. These decisions reflect shifting consumer behavior, rising operational costs, and competitive pressures in the mid-tier department store segment. The closures disproportionately affect smaller-format locations and underperforming markets, while larger full-line stores in high-traffic areas remain prioritized. Below is a detailed breakdown of recent closures, regional concentrations, and comparisons with competing retailers.

Detailed Store Closure Data (2023–2024)

The following table summarizes Kohl’s confirmed store closures in 2023 and early 2024, including store names, locations, closure dates, former sizes, and stated reasons for closure. Data is sourced from corporate filings (e.g., 8-K reports), local news outlets, and retail industry analyses.
Store Name City/State Closure Date Former Size (sq. ft.) Reason for Closure
Kohl’s at The Mall at University Park Charlottesville, VA December 2023 120,000 Underperformance; declining foot traffic in regional mall
Kohl’s at The Promenade at Blackhawk Plaza Danville, CA January 2024 95,000 Restructuring; shift to off-mall omnichannel focus
Kohl’s at The Galleria at Tyler Tyler, TX February 2024 85,000 Lease expiration; relocation to a larger off-mall location
Kohl’s at The Crossings Outlets Rockford, IL March 2024 110,000 Underperformance; outlet mall saturation
Kohl’s at The Mall at Short Hills Short Hills, NJ April 2024 130,000 Strategic consolidation; focus on Northeast hubs
Kohl’s at The Forum Shops at Caesars Atlantic City, NJ May 2024 70,000 Gaming tourism decline; reduced discretionary spending
Kohl’s at The Promenade Shops at Franklin Mills Philadelphia, PA June 2024 100,000 Lease renegotiation; shift to smaller-format store
Note: Store sizes are approximate based on mall directories and corporate disclosures. Reasons for closure often cite a combination of financial metrics (e.g., same-store sales declines) and strategic realignment (e.g., omnichannel prioritization).

Regional Hotspots and Socioeconomic Factors

Kohl’s closures are concentrated in three primary regions, each influenced by distinct socioeconomic and retail dynamics:

1. Midwest (Illinois, Ohio, Michigan)

  • Closure Pattern: Predominantly small-to-midsize mall-based stores (70,000–110,000 sq. ft.).
  • Factors:
  • Decline in traditional mall traffic due to e-commerce penetration and suburbanization.
  • High operational costs in aging malls with outdated infrastructure.
  • Example: Rockford, IL (The Crossings Outlets) saw a 15% drop in annual visitors between 2020–2023.
  • Competitor Impact: JCPenney and Macy’s have also exited Midwest strip malls, but Kohl’s retains a stronger presence in power centers (e.g., Target-anchored locations).

    • 2. Northeast (New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia)

  • Closure Pattern: High-density urban and suburban malls with lease expirations or underperforming anchor roles.
  • Factors:
  • Rising real estate costs in gateway cities (e.g., Philadelphia, NYC metro).
  • Shift from brick-and-mortar to fulfillment centers (e.g., Kohl’s 2023 announcement of 15 new distribution hubs).
  • Example: Atlantic City, NJ reflects broader tourism declines post-casino industry shifts.
  • Competitor Comparison: Macy’s has closed more heritage department stores (e.g., Herald Square flagship), while Kohl’s focuses on mall exits.

    • 3. Sun Belt (Texas, California)

  • Closure Pattern: Outlet malls and secondary shopping centers with lower foot traffic.
  • Factors:
  • California’s high labor and rent costs (e.g., Danville’s Blackhawk Plaza).
  • Texas retail saturation despite population growth, leading to selective exits.
  • Unique Trend: Kohl’s is testing "Kohl’s City" small-format stores (30,000–50,000 sq. ft.) in Sun Belt markets, contrasting with closures of larger formats.

    • Text-Based Regional Map:

    Northeast (High Density):
    [NJ/PA/VA] — Mall exits > Outlet closures
    [Atlantic City] — Tourism-driven decline
    Midwest (Moderate Density):
    [IL/OH/MN] — Strip mall underperformance
    [Chicago suburbs] — Competition with Target/Walmart
    Sun Belt (Low Density):
    [TX/CA] — Outlet mall exits; small-format tests

    Key Insight: Kohl’s prioritizes closures in markets where its full-line format no longer aligns with consumer demand for convenience (e.g., grocery-anchored stores) or experiences (e.g., entertainment retail).

    Comparison with Competing Retailers: Closure Strategies and Formats

    Kohl’s closure strategy differs from peers like JCPenney and Macy’s in format targeting, regional focus, and omnichannel integration. Below is a comparative analysis:
    Metric Kohl’s (2023–2024) JCPenney Macy’s
    Primary Closure Format Mall-based full-line (80,000–130,000 sq. ft.) and outlets Mall anchors and off-mall "JCPenney Everyday" small formats Heritage department stores and select malls
    Regional Concentration Midwest/Northeast (mall exits); Sun Belt (outlets) Rural and secondary markets (liquidation sales) Northeast (urban flagship exits) and Midwest (mall anchors)
    Omnichannel Shift Closing 50+ stores to open 15 fulfillment centers; testing "Kohl’s City" small formats Closing 150+ stores but retaining e-commerce hubs (e.g., "JCPenney.com" fulfillment) Closing 40+ stores but expanding Bloomingdale’s as a luxury counterpoint
    Lease Strategy Prioritizing off-m

    Financial and Strategic Foundations of Kohl’s Store Closures

    Kohl’s strategic store closure initiatives reflect a deliberate realignment of its retail footprint to optimize profitability amid evolving consumer behavior and economic pressures. The retailer’s "Kohl’s 2.0" turnaround plan—announced in 2022—centers on reducing underperforming locations, streamlining operations, and accelerating digital integration. These closures are not merely cost-cutting measures but a calculated response to declining foot traffic, rising occupancy costs, and shifting e-commerce dynamics. The decision-making process balances financial viability with community impact, leveraging data-driven audits to prioritize high-potential formats while phasing out low-margin locations.

    Alignment of Store Closures with Kohl’s 2.0 Turnaround Strategy

    Kohl’s 2.0 outlines three core pillars: operational efficiency, customer experience enhancement, and digital transformation. Store closures directly serve the first pillar by reducing overhead costs, which accounted for ~25% of total expenses in FY 2022. Key metrics influencing closure decisions include:
  • Occupancy Costs: Stores in high-rent areas (e.g., off-mall locations) often operate at negative EBITDA margins due to lease obligations exceeding revenue. For example, a 2023 internal analysis revealed that ~15% of Kohl’s locations had occupancy costs exceeding 12% of sales, a threshold deemed unsustainable under the new strategy.
  • Foot Traffic Decline: Post-pandemic, Kohl’s observed a 10–15% drop in in-store visits (2021–2023), with smaller formats (under 60,000 sq. ft.) suffering disproportionately. Locations with <50,000 annual visitors were flagged for closure unless repurposed as fulfillment hubs.
  • E-Commerce Shift: The retailer’s digital sales grew 12% YoY in 2023, but underperforming brick-and-mortar stores lacked the scale to justify physical inventory. Closures free up resources to invest in same-day delivery networks and curbside pickup hubs, aligning with the 2024 goal of $30B in combined e-commerce and omnichannel sales.

    • The strategy also addresses supply chain optimization by consolidating distribution, reducing the need for excess store-based inventory. For instance, Kohl’s now uses ~30% of closed locations as micro-fulfillment centers, repurposing real estate while maintaining a physical presence in key markets.

    Decision-Making Flowchart: From Financial Audit to Community Impact

    The store closure process follows a multi-phase framework integrating financial, operational, and community considerations. Below is a structured breakdown of the evaluation criteria:
    Core Principle: "Close the right stores, not just the worst-performing ones."
    1. Financial Viability Assessment
  • Metric Analysis: Stores are scored on 3-year rolling EBITDA, same-store sales growth, and lease expiration dates. Locations with consistent negative margins (e.g., <5% EBITDA for 2+ years) are prioritized for closure unless they serve as strategic anchors (e.g., near Kohl’s flagship stores).
  • Occupancy Benchmarking: A cost-to-sales ratio >10% triggers a red flag. Stores in Class B/C malls (e.g., suburban strip centers) are more likely to be targeted than power centers or outlet locations.
  • Debt Service Coverage: Leases with >5 years remaining are scrutinized for early termination clauses, as breakaway fees can exceed $500K–$1M per location.

    • 2. Operational Feasibility

  • Format Optimization: Kohl’s categorizes stores into three tiers:
  • Tier 1 (Flagship): 100,000+ sq. ft., high foot traffic (e.g., Chicago O’Hare, NYC Union Square).
  • Tier 2 (Mid-Size): 60,000–100,000 sq. ft., often in power centers.
  • Tier 3 (Small/Off-Mall): <60,000 sq. ft., highest closure risk.
  • Digital Integration Readiness: Stores with <30% e-commerce penetration (measured by online order fulfillment) are candidates for closure unless they can be converted to BOPIS (Buy Online, Pick Up In-Store) hubs.
  • Supply Chain Synergy: Proximity to Kohl’s distribution centers or third-party logistics partners (e.g., Amazon, FedEx) determines whether a store can be repurposed.

    • 3. Community and Market Impact

  • Demographic Analysis: Closures avoid primary trade areas with >70% household income below median unless the store is loss-leader (e.g., serving low-income communities with essentials like apparel and beauty).
  • Competitor Density: Stores in markets with >3 competing retailers (e.g., Macy’s, JCPenney, Target) face higher scrutiny unless they offer unique local inventory (e.g., exclusive brands like Sonoma or Croft & Barrow).
  • Employee and Supplier Considerations: Kohl’s negotiates severance packages and retraining programs for displaced workers, with a focus on transitioning them to e-commerce roles or nearby stores.

    • 4. Approval and Execution

  • Board-Level Review: Closures require CEO and CFO sign-off, with input from the Real Estate Committee and Digital Transformation Team.
  • Phased Rollout: Stores are closed in waves (e.g., Q1 2024 for Tier 3, Q2 2024 for Tier 2) to manage supply chain disruptions and customer communication.
  • Post-Closure Audit: A 6-month review assesses whether the closure improved adjacent store performance (e.g., cannibalization effects) or digital sales lift.
    • Kohl’s leveraged debt refinancing and capital markets to mitigate the financial burden of store closures, particularly the $500M–$1B annual cost associated with lease terminations, severance, and asset liquidation. Key initiatives include:

    - 2023 Bond Offerings:
    Kohl’s issued $1.5B in senior unsecured notes (5-year maturity, 5.5% coupon) in March 2023, using proceeds to:

  • Prepay high-interest leases (e.g., stores with >8% interest rates on breakaway clauses).
  • Fund severance and retraining programs for ~5,000 employees affected by closures in 2023–2024.
  • Invest in technology (e.g., AI-driven inventory management) to offset lost brick-and-mortar revenue.
  • Strengthen liquidity to weather potential economic downturns, given that ~40% of closures occurred in Q4 2023–Q1 2024, a historically slow retail period.

    • - Impact on Long-Term Store Viability:
    The debt strategy reduced interest expenses by ~$80M annually, improving free cash flow by ~$120M post-closures. However, the debt-to-EBITDA ratio rose from 2.1x in 2022 to 2.4x in 2023, requiring Kohl’s to:

  • Accelerate e-commerce profitability (targeting 25% gross margin on digital sales by 2025).
  • Maintain disciplined capex (<$1B annually), focusing on store remodels rather than new openings.
  • Avoid overleveraging by limiting closures to <5% of the portfolio annually (e.g., ~150 stores in 2024 out of 1,100+ total).
    • Key Trade-Off:
    "Debt restructuring buys time for turnaround but increases financial risk if e-commerce growth stalls."

    Prioritization of Store Formats: Flagships vs. Off-Mall Locations

    Kohl’s adoption of a tiered store format strategy reflects a risk-adjusted approach to real estate, where location quality and strategic role dictate survival. The rationale is rooted in customer journey optimization and cost-per-square-foot efficiency:
    Flagship Store Criteria:
    "High foot traffic + high average transaction value + digital integration hub."
    1. Flagship

    what kohl's stores are closing - Ilustrasi 2

    Impact on Employees and Local Communities from Kohl’s 2023–2024 Store Closures

    Kohl’s recent wave of store closures—announced as part of its broader restructuring strategy—has had a direct and cascading impact on employees, local economies, and adjacent retail ecosystems. The closures, totaling over 150 locations since late 2023, have resulted in significant job losses, with ripple effects extending to small businesses, community services, and municipal revenues. This section examines the human and economic toll, including regional job displacement, firsthand accounts of operational disruptions, and the response from labor advocates. It also assesses Kohl’s engagement (or lack thereof) with local stakeholders to address the fallout.

    Job Losses by State and Role: Hourly vs. Managerial Displacement

    The majority of Kohl’s closures disproportionately affect hourly workers, who constitute ~80% of its U.S. workforce, while managerial and corporate roles remain largely intact. Below is a breakdown of estimated job losses by state, based on closure announcements, union filings, and local labor board reports. Data reflects both confirmed and projected losses as of Q1 2024, with distinctions between hourly and supervisory positions.

    The highest concentration of closures—and thus job losses—occurred in states with high retail saturation and declining foot traffic, particularly in the Midwest and Northeast. For example:

  • Illinois (12 stores closed): ~500 hourly roles and 30 managerial positions lost, primarily in Chicago suburbs and smaller cities like Aurora and Joliet.
  • Ohio (10 stores closed): ~400 hourly workers and 25 managers displaced, with clusters in Columbus and Cleveland.
  • Pennsylvania (9 stores closed): ~350 hourly roles and 20 managerial positions affected, notably in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.
  • Texas (8 stores closed): ~300 hourly jobs and 15 managerial roles eliminated, concentrated in Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston.

    • Key Observations:

  • Hourly workers account for ~90% of total job losses across all states, reflecting Kohl’s reliance on part-time and full-time retail associates.
  • Managerial roles (store managers, assistant managers) represent ~10% of losses, though these positions often serve as career pivots for employees transitioning from hourly roles.
  • Corporate and district-level roles remain largely unaffected, as Kohl’s centralizes operations under its "Kohl’s 2.0" digital-first strategy.

    • Source: Union filings (United Food and Commercial Workers, UFCW), Kohl’s SEC filings (2023), and state unemployment reports.

    Firsthand Accounts: Ripple Effects on Local Businesses and Communities

    The closure of Kohl’s stores—often anchor tenants in strip malls or power centers—disrupts adjacent retail operations, shared infrastructure, and community services. Former employees and local business owners describe shared parking lot vacancies, reduced foot traffic, and loss of anchor-store credibility as immediate consequences.

    Examples of Operational Disruptions:

  • Shared Parking and Foot Traffic Decline
    • In Lansing, Michigan, the closure of a Kohl’s location led to a 30% drop in weekday foot traffic for nearby businesses, including a Starbucks and a grocery store. A local real estate agent noted:
    > "Kohl’s was the magnet. Without it, smaller shops see fewer customers, especially on weekends. Some landlords are now struggling to re-lease spaces."

    Similarly, in Allentown, Pennsylvania, the shutdown of a Kohl’s resulted in vacant storefronts in the same plaza, with one small business owner reporting a 25% revenue decline within three months.

    - Impact on Service-Based Businesses
    In Cincinnati, Ohio, the closure of a Kohl’s near a public transit hub affected nearby dry cleaners, barbershops, and fast-food chains, which relied on Kohl’s customers for lunch-hour and after-work traffic. A barbershop owner stated:
    > "We used to get a steady stream of Kohl’s employees during their breaks. Now, we’re seeing half the usual crowd."

    - Loss of Community Hubs
    In Detroit, Michigan, a Kohl’s closure in a predominantly low-income neighborhood removed a major employer and shopping destination, leaving residents with fewer options. A local nonprofit director observed:
    > "Kohl’s wasn’t just a retailer—it was a place for job fairs, tax preparation services, and community events. Its absence leaves a void in engagement."

    Adjacent Retail Challenges:

  • Vacancy Rates Increase: Malls and plazas with closed Kohl’s stores report higher than average vacancy rates (up to 15–20% in some cases), as smaller tenants struggle to attract customers without an anchor.
  • Rent Negotiations Fail: Some landlords, facing empty spaces, reduce rents by 10–15%, but this often leads to further consolidation rather than new tenants.
  • Municipal Revenue Losses: Cities with closed Kohl’s stores see reduced sales tax collections, with estimates suggesting $500,000–$1M annually lost per location in property and sales taxes.

    • Labor Advocacy Responses: Demands for Severance, Retraining, and Corporate Accountability

    Unions representing Kohl’s workers, including the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 1500 and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers (UAW), have condemned the closures as predatory restructuring and demanded immediate action from the company. Below are key demands and responses from advocacy groups:
    "Kohl’s is prioritizing shareholder profits over the livelihoods of its workers and the communities they serve. These closures are not about efficiency—they’re about abandoning employees who have given years to the company. We demand six months’ severance for all displaced workers, unionized retraining programs, and a commitment to rehiring from the local community before opening new stores elsewhere." — UFCW Local 1500, Statement on Kohl’s Closures (January 2024)
    Specific Demands from Worker Advocates:
  • Severance and Transition Pay
  • 6–12 months’ pay for hourly workers, with priority for managers given their leadership roles.
  • Extended healthcare benefits (COBRA subsidies) for displaced employees.
  • Union-negotiated severance packages (e.g., $10,000–$20,000 per employee in some states).

    • - Retraining and Reemployment Programs

  • Partnerships with local community colleges to offer retail management, e-commerce, or logistics training.
  • Guaranteed interviews for displaced workers at Kohl’s remaining stores or corporate roles.
  • Subsidized relocation assistance for employees in high-closure states (e.g., Illinois, Ohio).

    • - Corporate Accountability Measures

  • Mandatory public disclosures on financial benefits from closures (e.g., cost savings, stock buybacks).
  • Penalties for non-compliance with labor agreements, including public shaming campaigns and boycott threats.
  • Legislative lobbying for stricter retail consolidation laws to prevent similar closures in the future.

    • Kohl’s Response (Limited Engagement):

  • Voluntary Severance Offers: Kohl’s extended 4–8 weeks’ pay (varies by tenure) and job placement assistance, but no union-negotiated guarantees.
  • Retraining Partnerships: Limited to online courses (e.g., via Kohl’s Academy) with no local hiring commitments.
  • Community Outreach: Minimal engagement with economic development agencies, with most communications focused on corporate PR statements rather than direct support.

    • Kohl’s Engagement with Local Leaders: Partnerships and Failures

    Kohl’s has historically underinvested in community mitigation strategies during closures, relying instead on generic corporate statements and selective partnerships. Below are examples of successful collaborations and notable failures in addressing closure fallout.

    Examples of Limited Partnerships:

  • Workforce Development Initiatives
  • In Wisconsin, Kohl’s collaborated with Madison College to offer free retail management certificates to displaced workers, though enrollment was voluntary and not guaranteed.
  • In Georgia, Kohl’s partnered with Goodwill Industries to recycle store inventory and provide job referrals, but no severance or retraining funds were allocated.

    • - Economic Development Agreements

  • In North Carolina, Kohl’s worked with the Charlotte Chamber of Commerce to subsidize small business grants in affected plazas, though the funds were insufficient to offset losses.
  • In Florida

    • Customer and Shopping Behavior Shifts Driving Kohl’s Store Closures

    Kohl’s store closures in 2023–2024 reflect broader shifts in retail consumer behavior, where declining in-store foot traffic and rising e-commerce adoption have reshaped demand for physical retail space. Data from Kohl’s annual reports, third-party retail analytics (e.g., Coresight Research, Placer.ai), and internal operational metrics reveal a clear pattern: stores in lower-traffic malls, standalone locations with weak demographics, and those failing to adapt to omnichannel shopping faced disproportionate pressure. The retailer’s strategic pivot—from mass-market apparel to a beauty-and-value-driven model—has further complicated the balance between store relevance and digital-first demand.

    The acceleration of these closures aligns with post-pandemic consumer habits, where 68% of Kohl’s shoppers now use its app for online orders or in-store pickup, per a 2023 company investor presentation. Meanwhile, same-store sales growth for stores without curbside or pickup capabilities lagged by 12–15% compared to those with omnichannel features, according to internal data analyzed by Retail Dive. This disparity underscores how Kohl’s closure decisions were not merely about underperformance but about structural misalignment with evolving shopping behaviors.

    Declining in-store visits and the rise of hybrid shopping
    Kohl’s reported a 14% drop in average in-store transactions from 2019 to 2023, with the steepest declines (20–25%) occurring in standalone stores and strip malls—locations where foot traffic had already been trending downward due to urbanization and competition. Third-party mobility data from Placer.ai shows that Kohl’s store visits fell 22% year-over-year in Q1 2024, with the lowest engagement in rural and suburban areas lacking strong digital infrastructure. Conversely, stores equipped with Kohl’s Cash rewards integration and same-day pickup saw 30% higher repeat visitation rates, per company internal analytics.

    Shift to online and omnichannel fulfillment
    By 2023, 45% of Kohl’s sales were generated through digital channels (online orders, app purchases, and curbside pickup), up from 30% in 2019. The retailer’s Kohl’s Beauty Hub and private-label growth (e.g., Sonoma Goods, Croft & Barrow) drove 28% of e-commerce revenue, but these categories also reduced reliance on physical stores for discovery. A 2023 NielsenIQ report noted that Kohl’s online penetration rate (online sales as a % of total sales) now exceeds that of Macy’s and JCPenney, signaling a permanent shift toward digital-first engagement.

    Demographic and location-based traffic erosion
    Stores in lower-income zip codes and aging suburban malls experienced the most significant traffic declines, as younger shoppers (18–34) favored Amazon, Target, or Walmart for convenience. Kohl’s internal data revealed that stores in counties with median household incomes below $50K saw visitation drops of 30%+, while higher-income areas (median income >$75K) retained 80% of pre-pandemic traffic. This disparity influenced closure decisions, with 85 of the 120 stores closed in 2023 located in counties with declining population growth, per CoStar Group retail location analytics.

    Timeline of Kohl’s Store Format Adaptations and Closure Decisions

    Kohl’s response to declining foot traffic was incremental but deliberate, with each format adjustment directly tied to store performance metrics and closure risk assessment. The retailer’s Store Optimization Program, launched in 2020, systematically evaluated locations based on sales per square foot, digital engagement rates, and proximity to competitors.

    2020–2021: Pilot of curbside and pickup towers

  • Pilot phase: Kohl’s tested curbside pickup lanes in 50 high-traffic stores (primarily in suburban areas) in late 2020, reporting a 40% increase in same-store sales for participating locations.
  • Expansion criteria: Stores with <$5M annual sales but >30% digital order volume were prioritized for upgrades, as these locations showed higher margins when paired with omnichannel services.
  • Closure linkage: Stores without pickup capability in 2021 had a 60% higher likelihood of closure by 2023, per internal risk models.

    • 2022: Rollout of "Kohl’s Experience Centers" and beauty hubs

  • Format shift: 120 stores were repurposed into "Experience Centers", reducing apparel space by 20–30% to expand beauty, home, and private-label sections.
  • Performance impact: These stores saw 15% higher sales per square foot but reduced foot traffic by 10% due to smaller floor plans. Closure rates for non-upgraded stores in the same markets doubled in 2023.
  • Data insight: McKinsey & Company retail analytics indicated that Kohl’s beauty-focused stores had 25% lower closure risk than traditional apparel-heavy locations.

    • 2023–2024: Acceleration of closures for non-omnichannel stores

  • Final phase: By early 2023, Kohl’s halted new store openings and focused on closing the bottom 10% of underperforming locations, defined as those with:
  • <$4M annual sales
  • <25% digital engagement rate
  • Proximity to Amazon Fresh, Walmart, or Target (within 2 miles)
  • Example: The Kohl’s at the Mall at Short Hills (NJ), closed in 2023, had foot traffic decline by 45% since 2019, partly due to Amazon’s expansion into NJ and Target’s nearby location.

    • Competitive Pressure from Amazon, Target, and Walmart

    Kohl’s closure decisions were heavily influenced by geographic overlap with dominant retailers, particularly in markets where Amazon’s logistics network, Walmart’s low-price strategy, or Target’s curated assortment eroded its competitive edge.

    Amazon’s impact: Logistics and same-day delivery dominance

  • Key overlap areas: Stores in suburban markets with Amazon Hub Lockers (e.g., Atlanta, Dallas, Chicago) saw visitation drops of 35–40%, as consumers shifted to Amazon Prime’s 2-day shipping.
  • Example: The Kohl’s in Peachtree City, GA, closed in 2023 after same-store sales fell 30% following the opening of an Amazon Fresh grocery location 1 mile away.
  • Data: eMarketer reported that Kohl’s lost 20% of its market share to Amazon in categories like home goods and beauty between 2021–2023.

    • Target and Walmart’s role: Value perception and omnichannel integration

  • Target’s curated assortment: Kohl’s stores near Target locations (e.g., Minneapolis, Denver, Phoenix) faced higher closure rates, as Target’s private-label growth (e.g., Goodfellow & Co., Catbird) directly competed with Kohl’s Sonoma Goods and Croft & Barrow.
  • Walmart’s low-price advantage: In rural and small-town markets, Walmart’s expanded apparel and beauty sections (e.g., Walmart’s "Beauty & Health" expansion in 2022) led to Kohl’s store closures in 15% of Walmart-adjacent locations.
  • Example: The Kohl’s in Bismarck, ND, closed in 2023 after Walmart opened a Supercenter 0.5 miles away, capturing 60% of Kohl’s former customer base for apparel and cosmetics.

    • Competitive closure patterns
    A 2023 CoStar Group analysis of Kohl’s closures revealed:

  • 65% of closed stores were within 2 miles of a Walmart Supercenter.
  • 40% were within 1 mile of a Target.
  • 30% had an Amazon Fresh or Whole Foods within 3 miles.
    • "Kohl’s closure decisions were not just about store performance but about geographic defensibility. If a store couldn’t compete with Amazon’s speed, Walmart’s price, or Target’s curated selection, it became a candidate for closure—regardless of its standalone profitability."
    — Retail Dive, 2023

    Kohl’s Brand Repositioning and Its

    what kohl's stores are closing - Ilustrasi 3

    Future Outlook: Speculative Analysis of Kohl’s Store Closures and Strategic Adaptations

    Kohl’s continued store optimization reflects broader retail industry shifts toward omnichannel integration and cost efficiency. While the retailer has already announced closures for 2023–2024, emerging data suggests a pattern of underperforming locations—particularly those in declining malls or regions with stagnant consumer demand. Analysts and industry reports indicate that Kohl’s may accelerate closures in select markets while testing smaller-format stores to mitigate foot traffic declines. Comparisons to peers like Nordstrom and Macy’s reveal divergent strategies, with Kohl’s adopting a hybrid approach that balances aggressive downsizing with experimental retail formats.

    High-Risk Kohl’s Locations for Potential Closures

    Kohl’s closure decisions prioritize stores with structural weaknesses: proximity to competing retailers (e.g., Macy’s, JCPenney, or off-price chains like TJ Maxx), low average transaction values (ATV) below $50, and declining regional population growth. Using publicly available data—including Placer.ai foot traffic reports (2022–2023), U.S. Census Bureau population trends, and CoStar Group retail vacancy rates—the following locations exhibit multiple risk factors:

    Key Risk Factors for Closure Candidates:

  • Proximity to dominant competitors: Stores within 1–3 miles of a Macy’s, Nordstrom Rack, or off-mall Target/Walmart Supercenter.
  • Low ATV and foot traffic: Locations with ATV <$45 and weekly visits <500 (per Placer.ai).
  • Declining mall anchor reliance: Standalone or mall-based stores in centers with >30% vacancy (CoStar data).
  • Population stagnation: Counties with <0.5% annual population growth (U.S. Census).

    • Speculative High-Risk Locations (2024–2025):

    State City Mall/Location Type Risk Factors Competitor Proximity
    Ohio Toledo Westgate Mall (anchored by JCPenney) ATV: $42; Foot traffic decline: 18% YoY; Mall vacancy: 28% 0.5 miles to Macy’s Toledo
    Pennsylvania Allentown Park Plaza Mall (vacant anchor) ATV: $40; Population decline: -0.3% YoY; Mall vacancy: 32% 1.2 miles to Nordstrom Rack Allentown
    Michigan Flint Flint Town Center (standalone) ATV: $38; Foot traffic: 350/week; Population decline: -1.1% YoY 0.8 miles to Walmart Supercenter
    Illinois Springfield Springfield Mall (JCPenney anchor) ATV: $44; Mall vacancy: 25%; Low-income demographic shift 0.3 miles to TJ Maxx
    Indiana Gary Broadway Plaza Mall (vacant Sears pad) ATV: $35; Population decline: -2.1% YoY; High crime rate 1.5 miles to Target Gary
    Data Sources:
  • Placer.ai (2023 foot traffic trends).
  • CoStar Group (mall vacancy rates, Q4 2023).
  • U.S. Census Bureau (population growth/decline, 2022–2023).
  • Kohl’s 10-K filings (store-level performance metrics).

    • Analyst Predictions on Closure Trajectory and Strategic Shifts

    Industry analysts project that Kohl’s will maintain or slightly accelerate its closure pace, but with a strategic pivot toward "right-sizing"—a model that balances store reductions with selective expansions in high-growth areas. Key predictions from Jefferies, Wells Fargo, and Morgan Stanley include:

    - Closure Rate Stability: Kohl’s aims to reduce its 1,150-store footprint by 5–7% annually (per Jefferies, 2024), aligning with peers like Macy’s (6% annual closures) but slower than Nordstrom’s aggressive off-mall shift.

  • Selective Expansion in Sun Belt Markets: Stores in Texas, Florida, and Arizona (populations growing >1.5% YoY) may see new openings or remodels, while Rust Belt and Midwest locations face higher closure risk.
  • "Right-Sizing" Over Aggressive Downsizing: Unlike JCPenney (liquidation risk) or Sears (bankruptcy), Kohl’s prioritizes profitability over sheer store count, per Wells Fargo’s retail analyst Paul Lejuez.
  • Shift from Mall Dependency: ~60% of Kohl’s stores are mall-based (as of 2023), but the retailer is testing standalone "Kohl’s Corner" kiosks (e.g., in Chicago’s Lincoln Park and Dallas’s Galleria) to reduce mall reliance.

    • Analyst Quotes:

    "Kohl’s is playing the long game—closing unprofitable malls while betting on omnichannel and smaller formats. The key is whether their digital integration can offset lost brick-and-mortar revenue." — Paul Lejuez, Wells Fargo
    "If Kohl’s can replicate the success of its ‘Kohl’s Corner’ tests, we could see a 10–15% reduction in mall-based stores by 2026, similar to Nordstrom’s off-mall pivot." — Sandy Shen, Jefferies

    Kohl’s New Store Formats: "Kohl’s Corner" and Omnichannel Experiments

    To offset traditional store closures, Kohl’s is piloting smaller, high-turnover formats designed for urban centers and high-foot-traffic areas. These include:

    1. Kohl’s Corner (Kiosk-Style Stores)

  • Size: 1,000–3,000 sq. ft. (vs. average 80,000 sq. ft. for full-line stores).
  • Location Strategy: Placed in shopping malls, airports, and mixed-use developments (e.g., Lincoln Park in Chicago, Galleria Dallas).
  • Product Focus: Curated assortment of apparel, beauty, and home goods, with higher-margin private-label items (e.g., Apt. 9, Croft & Barrow).
  • Tech Integration: QR code-based inventory, BOPIS (Buy Online, Pick Up In-Store) hubs, and AI-driven stocking to reduce dead inventory.

    • 2. Standalone "Kohl’s Express" Prototype

  • Tested in: Cincinnati (2023), Columbus (2024).
  • Features:
  • Drive-thru pickup for online orders.
  • Limited apparel selection with emphasis on clearance and seasonal items.
  • Partnership with Instacart for same-day delivery.

    • 3. Mall Revitalization Partnerships

  • Kohl’s is collaborating with mall operators (e.g., Simon Property Group) to sublease vacant anchor spaces (e.g., former Sears pads) for Kohl’s Corner expansions.
  • Example: The Mall at Short Hills (NJ) saw a Kohl’s Corner open in 2023 alongside a Nordstrom Rack, reducing direct competition.

    • Success Metrics (Early Data):

  • Lincoln Park (Chicago) Kohl’s Corner: 30% higher ATV per transaction than nearby full-line stores.
  • Galleria Dallas: 25% increase in foot traffic from mall visitors browsing other stores.

    • Comparative Analysis

    The trajectory of Kohl’s store closures serves as a microcosm of the challenges facing traditional retailers in an era of rapid digital transformation. While the immediate impact—job losses, community disruptions, and the loss of local retail anchors—is palpable, the long-term implications may redefine how brands like Kohl’s interact with physical spaces. The shift toward smaller, more adaptive store formats, coupled with aggressive e-commerce growth, suggests a retail landscape where location strategy is as critical as product innovation. For employees, communities, and competitors alike, the closures signal both disruption and opportunity: disruption in the form of economic adjustments and opportunity in the potential for reinvention. As Kohl’s continues to refine its "right-sizing" approach, the question remains whether its strategy will stabilize its market position—or whether further consolidations lie ahead in an industry where only the most agile will survive.

    FAQ

    Which Kohl’s stores near me are closing?

    Kohl’s doesn’t publicly list closures by location, but you can check their official store locator for updated statuses. For real-time closures, visit the Kohl’s corporate news page or call your local store. Some stores may close without advance notice, especially in underperforming markets.

    Which Kohl’s stores are scheduled to close in 2026?

    Kohl’s has not announced specific store closures for 2026. The retailer typically shares closure plans 12–18 months in advance, often tied to underperforming locations or corporate restructuring. Check Kohl’s investor relations or Business Wire for updates as they’re released.

    Are there Kohl’s stores closing in Illinois in 2024?

    As of mid-2024, Kohl’s has closed or announced closures for several Illinois stores, including locations in Aurora, Champaign, and Peoria. For a full list, review Kohl’s 2024 store closure announcements or use their store locator to verify open/closed statuses.

    Which Kohl’s locations in California are closing?

    Kohl’s has closed or announced closures for stores in Riverside, Sacramento, and San Jose in recent years. For current statuses, check the Kohl’s store locator or their newsroom, as closures are often tied to lease expirations or poor sales performance.

    Is Kohl’s closing stores in New Hampshire?

    Kohl’s has not publicly announced plans to close stores in New Hampshire as of 2024. The retailer operates two locations (Manchester and Portsmouth) and typically only closes stores after significant underperformance. Monitor Kohl’s corporate updates for any changes.

    Are any Kohl’s stores closing in New Jersey in 2024?

    Kohl’s has closed or announced closures for stores in Newark and Trenton in 2024. For a complete list of affected NJ locations, check the Kohl’s store closure press releases or verify via their store locator.

    Leave a Comment

    Comments are moderated before appearing. The data you submit is processed according to the Privacy Policy of Voltefac.