What Is Volunteering Explained Fundamentally And Practically

Decision-Making Process for Volunteer Commitment

1. Self-Reflection and Motivation

2. Identifying Needs and Opportunities

Types and Forms of Volunteering

Categorization of Volunteering Types

Volunteering is broadly classified into five primary types, each serving distinct functions within communities and organizations:

• Direct Service Volunteering
  Involves hands-on assistance to individuals or communities in need, often addressing immediate physical, social, or emotional requirements. Examples include food distribution at shelters, tutoring students, or assisting elderly populations with daily tasks. This form prioritizes tangible outcomes, such as improved health, education, or safety, and typically requires minimal prior training but high emotional or physical stamina.
• Advocacy and Awareness Volunteering
  Focuses on raising public consciousness, influencing policy, or amplifying marginalized voices. Roles may include organizing protests, drafting petitions, lobbying government bodies, or creating educational campaigns. Advocacy volunteers often collaborate with nonprofits, NGOs, or grassroots movements, leveraging communication skills and research acumen to drive systemic change.
• Skills-Based Volunteering
  Utilizes professional expertise to address organizational gaps without direct service delivery. Common roles include pro bono legal or financial consulting, graphic design for nonprofits, or IT support for small businesses. This form is particularly valuable for professionals seeking to apply specialized knowledge while offering flexible, often remote, engagement.
• Virtual Volunteering
  Executes tasks remotely through digital platforms, eliminating geographical barriers. Activities range from online tutoring, social media management for charities, to transcribing interviews for accessibility. Virtual roles demand self-discipline, technical proficiency, and clear communication, but offer unparalleled scalability for global initiatives.
• Disaster and Crisis Response Volunteering
  Provides time-sensitive support during emergencies, including natural disasters, pandemics, or humanitarian crises. Roles may involve search-and-rescue operations, medical triage, or logistical coordination. These positions require rapid deployment, specialized training (e.g., first aid, emergency management), and adherence to strict protocols to ensure safety and efficacy.

Comparison of Traditional and Modern Volunteering Forms

Case Studies of Niche Volunteer Roles

• Disaster Response Volunteering: Search-and-Rescue Operations

  Operational Framework: Coordination begins with pre-disaster training through organizations like the International Search and Rescue Advisory Group (INSARAG). Volunteers, often with backgrounds in emergency medicine, engineering, or canine handling, deploy rapidly to affected regions. Key procedures include:

  • Pre-Deployment: Medical screening, equipment familiarization, and role-specific drills (e.g., urban search techniques).
  • On-Site: Integration with local authorities to avoid duplication of efforts; use of drones or thermal imaging for large-area searches.
  • Post-Deployment: Debriefing, trauma counseling, and data collection for future preparedness (e.g., mapping vulnerable infrastructure).

  Case Example: During the 2015 Nepal earthquake, INSARAG deployed 1,200 volunteers from 50 countries, rescuing 1,500 survivors within 72 hours. Challenges included language barriers and logistical delays due to damaged infrastructure, highlighting the need for multilingual teams and pre-positioned supplies.

• Wildlife Conservation Volunteering: Anti-Poaching Patrols

  Operational Framework: Volunteers collaborate with NGOs such as African Parks or the Wildlife Conservation Society, often stationed in protected areas like national parks. Procedures include:

  • Training: Firearms safety (for rangers), wildlife tracking, and community engagement to reduce human-wildlife conflict.
  • Fieldwork: 24/7 patrols using drones, motion-sensor cameras, and GPS collars to monitor endangered species (e.g., rhinos, elephants).
  • Data Reporting: Real-time alerts to authorities via satellite communication; collaboration with law enforcement for poacher apprehensions.

  Case Example: In Rwanda’s Akagera National Park, volunteers from the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund assist with anti-poaching efforts, achieving a 90% reduction in illegal wildlife trade incidents since 2018. Volunteers also participate in habitat restoration, such as replanting native vegetation to support gorilla populations.

• Tech Mentorship Volunteering: Coding for Nonprofits

  Operational Framework: Platform
  

  

  Motivations and Psychological Drivers of Volunteering

  Volunteering is driven by a complex interplay of psychological, emotional, and social factors that transcend mere altruism. Research in psychology and behavioral science identifies intrinsic motivations—such as personal fulfillment, empathy, and self-actualization—as foundational, while extrinsic rewards, including career advancement or social recognition, also play a significant role. Understanding these motivations requires examining both individual psychology and broader sociocultural influences, including trauma, social movements, and economic disparities. The interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic factors can be visualized through frameworks like the Social Exchange Theory and Self-Determination Theory, which explain how volunteers weigh perceived benefits against personal values.

  The psychological drivers of volunteerism are deeply rooted in human cognition, emotional regulation, and social identity. Studies indicate that volunteers often seek to alleviate negative emotions (e.g., guilt, helplessness) while reinforcing positive ones (e.g., purpose, belonging). Below, a structured analysis explores these motivations, their theoretical underpinnings, and real-world applications, including cross-cultural comparisons between developed and developing economies.
  

  Primary Psychological and Emotional Motivations Behind Volunteering

  Volunteering is frequently initiated by a combination of affective, cognitive, and behavioral motivations that align with an individual’s values, past experiences, and social environment. Empirical research categorizes these motivations into distinct yet interconnected factors, often measured through scales like the Volunteer Functions Inventory (VFI). The following numbered list outlines the most empirically supported psychological drivers, emphasizing their role in sustaining long-term engagement.
  
  1. Empathy and Compassion
     Volunteers often report heightened emotional responsiveness to others’ suffering, driven by mirror neuron activation (neuroscientific evidence) or theory of mind (cognitive empathy). Studies in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2018) link early childhood experiences—such as witnessing parental altruism—to later volunteerism. For example, individuals who grew up in communities with strong collective values (e.g., religious or cooperative societies) exhibit greater prosocial behavior.
  2. Personal Growth and Self-Actualization
     Volunteering fulfills Maslow’s hierarchy of needs at the self-actualization level, where individuals seek meaning beyond material success. The Self-Determination Theory (SDT) by Deci and Ryan (2000) posits that autonomy, competence, and relatedness are key drivers. Volunteers often cite skills development (e.g., leadership, technical expertise) and post-traumatic growth as outcomes, particularly after crises like natural disasters or pandemics.
  3. Social Connection and Belonging
     The need for social affiliation (Baumeister & Leary, 1995) is a powerful motivator, as volunteering provides structured opportunities for interaction. Research in Psychological Science (2015) shows that volunteers in group settings experience reduced loneliness and increased oxytocin levels, a hormone associated with trust and bonding. Examples include intergenerational programs (e.g., mentoring elderly populations) or community-based activism, where shared purpose strengthens relationships.
  4. Value Congruence and Moral Obligation
     Volunteers often align their actions with deeply held values, such as justice, equity, or environmental stewardship. The Norm of Reciprocity (Gouldner, 1960) suggests that individuals feel compelled to "give back" when they perceive societal benefits (e.g., education, healthcare). Movements like #MeToo or climate activism demonstrate how moral outrage can trigger volunteerism, with studies showing a 30% increase in advocacy-related volunteering post-movement (Pew Research, 2021).
  5. Coping with Trauma or Loss
     Volunteering serves as a meaning-making mechanism for individuals processing grief or adversity. The Benefit-Finding Model (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004) highlights how volunteers channel pain into purpose, such as survivors of 9/11 who joined disaster relief organizations or families of victims of mass shootings who advocate for gun control. Trauma-informed volunteering (e.g., peer support groups) leverages this psychological resilience.
  6. Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Rewards: A Venn Diagram Framework
     The motivations for volunteering can be visualized using a two-circle Venn diagram, where:
     
  7. Intrinsic motivations (left circle) include personal satisfaction, emotional fulfillment, and skill mastery.
  8. Extrinsic motivations (right circle) encompass career benefits (e.g., networking, resume enhancement), social recognition (e.g., awards, media mentions), and material incentives (e.g., stipends, certifications).
  9. Overlap (intersection) represents hybrid motivations, such as volunteering for career advancement in a cause one cares about or gaining skills while contributing to a community need. Research in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (2019) found that 68% of volunteers cited intrinsic rewards as primary, though extrinsic factors (e.g., LinkedIn profile visibility) significantly influence high-skilled professionals.

  Key Insight: Volunteers with high intrinsic motivation tend to sustain long-term engagement, while those driven primarily by extrinsic rewards may disengage once benefits diminish (e.g., after receiving a certification).

  Altruism in Volunteering: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence

  Altruism—the act of helping others without expecting immediate rewards—remains a cornerstone of volunteerism, though its psychological mechanisms are debated. Social Exchange Theory (Thibaut & Kelley, 1959) argues that even altruistic behavior involves a cost-benefit analysis, where volunteers weigh emotional returns (e.g., pride) against effort. Conversely, Pure Altruism Theory (Batson, 1991) posits that empathy-driven helping exists independently of self-interest.

  Key theories and studies include:
  

• Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis (Batson, 1987): Volunteers experiencing emotional contagion (e.g., distress from witnessing poverty) are more likely to act altruistically. Experiments show that high-empathy individuals donate 23% more time to causes than low-empathy counterparts (Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2017).
• Negative State Relief Model: Volunteering alleviates guilt, anxiety, or helplessness, reinforcing prosocial behavior. For example, post-disaster volunteers report reduced PTSD symptoms while aiding survivors (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 2020).
• Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979): Volunteers derive satisfaction from group membership, such as belonging to a religious order, activist collective, or corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiative. This explains why group-based volunteering (e.g., Habitat for Humanity) has higher retention rates than individual efforts.

Critique: While altruism is idealized, real-world volunteering often blends self-interest and other-regarding motives. For instance, medical professionals volunteering abroad may gain clinical experience while providing care—both intrinsic (fulfillment) and extrinsic (career) benefits.

Trauma, Social Movements, and Volunteerism as Coping or Advocacy Mechanisms

Volunteering frequently emerges as a psychological coping strategy or political advocacy tool in response to collective trauma or societal injustices. Below are case studies illustrating how personal or systemic crises catalyze volunteer engagement.

1. Trauma-Informed Volunteering
   Individuals exposed to violence, loss, or displacement often channel their experiences into volunteerism to regain agency. Examples:
   
2. Refugees and Asylum Seekers: Studies on Syrian refugees in Germany (2015–2020) found that 42% of resettled individuals volunteered within two years, citing purpose restoration and community integration as key drivers (International Journal of Migration and Integration, 2021).
3. Domestic Violence Survivors: Programs like Safe Horizon (NYC) report that 60% of survivor volunteers transition from recipients to advocates, using their trauma narratives to reduce stigma and improve services.
4. Social Movements and Collective Action
   Movements like #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, and climate strikes have spurred movement-based volunteering, where advocacy intersects with service. Key patterns:
   
5. #MeToo (2017–present): Volunteerism in sexual assault support organizations surged by 150% post-movement, with 85% of new volunteers identifying as women

Structures and Organizations Supporting Volunteering

Volunteering operates within a complex ecosystem of formal and informal structures, ranging from global intergovernmental bodies to hyper-local grassroots initiatives. These entities provide governance, coordination, training, and logistical support, ensuring that volunteer efforts align with broader social, humanitarian, and developmental goals. Their hierarchical models—whether centralized, decentralized, or hybrid—determine efficiency, scalability, and adaptability to diverse needs. Below, the organizational frameworks of major volunteer-supporting bodies are examined, alongside their mechanisms for global coordination, virtual matching systems, and strategies to address challenges faced by smaller, community-driven groups.


Hierarchical Structures and Governance Models of Volunteer Organizations

Major volunteer-supporting organizations adopt distinct governance models tailored to their scale, mission, and operational scope. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) typically operate under one of three primary structures:

- Centralized Hierarchies: Common in large international NGOs (e.g., Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) or Oxfam), where decision-making authority resides at the headquarters, with regional and local branches executing standardized programs. This model ensures consistency in branding, ethical standards, and resource allocation but may limit local adaptability.


6. Example: UNICEF operates under a hybrid centralized-decentralized model, with global policy directives from New York but country-specific offices managing field operations.

- Federated Networks: Used by organizations like the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (IFRC), where national societies retain autonomy while adhering to shared principles (e.g., neutrality, impartiality). Governance occurs through General Assemblies and International Committees, balancing local relevance with global coordination.


7. Key Feature: The IFRC’s Statutes mandate that national societies contribute 1% of their annual budget to the International Federation, ensuring financial solidarity.

- Flat or Collective Structures: Prevalent in grassroots or activist-led groups (e.g., Greenpeace’s decentralized campaigns), where decisions emerge from consensus-based meetings. This model fosters innovation and responsiveness but risks inefficiency in large-scale crises.

United Nations Agencies (e.g., UN Volunteers (UNV)) follow a mandate-driven structure, where governance is dictated by UN resolutions (e.g., General Assembly Resolution 50/50 establishing UNV as a program of the UN Development Group). Their governance involves:


8. Executive Board: Oversees strategic direction.
9. Country Offices: Implement volunteer programs in collaboration with host governments.
10. Partnerships: Coordinate with NGOs, private sector, and civil society (e.g., UNV’s collaboration with the ILO on decent work initiatives).

Coordination of Global Volunteer Efforts by International Bodies

International volunteer coordination relies on multi-stakeholder partnerships, standardized training frameworks, and adaptive deployment systems. Key mechanisms include:

Funding and Resource Mobilization


11. UN Volunteers (UNV) secures funding through:
12. Voluntary contributions from UN member states (e.g., $120 million annual budget, with 30% from governments and 70% from private donors).
13. In-kind support (e.g., Microsoft’s Azure cloud credits for digital volunteer platforms).
14. Corporate partnerships (e.g., DHL’s logistics support for volunteer deployments).
15. Red Cross/Red Crescent Movement leverages the International Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF), which pools contributions from national societies to respond to sudden-onset crises.

Training and Capacity Building


16. Standardized Curricula: UNV’s Volunteer Competency Framework outlines core skills (e.g., cultural sensitivity, risk management) adapted for sectors like health (e.g., Ebola response), climate action, or gender equality.
17. Online Learning: Platforms like UNV’s e-learning portal offer courses in project cycle management and digital literacy, accessible to volunteers globally.
18. Field-Specific Certifications: The IFRC’s Emergency Health Component (EHC) provides First Responder and Psychosocial Support training for volunteers in conflict zones.

Deployment and Monitoring


19. UNV’s Volunteer Deployment Process:
1. Needs Assessment: Conducted by UN agencies or host governments (e.g., UNDP’s Country Offices).
2. Matching: Aligns volunteer skills with UN SDG targets (e.g., a data analyst deployed to UNICEF’s education programs).
3. Contracting: Volunteers sign host government agreements (e.g., UNV’s "Terms of Reference" for online volunteers).
4. Monitoring: Uses KPIs like volunteer retention rates (85% for long-term assignments) and impact reports (e.g., UNV’s 2022 Global Report tracking 10,000+ volunteers in 130 countries).

Challenges in Global Coordination


20. Bureaucracy: UN processes often face slow approval cycles (e.g., 3–6 months for volunteer deployment in conflict zones).
21. Funding Gaps: UNV’s budget covers only 40% of demand, leading to underutilized volunteer potential in Least Developed Countries (LDCs).
22. Language Barriers: 60% of UNV volunteers require multilingual training, complicating deployment in non-English/French/Spanish regions.

Virtual Volunteer Platforms: Skill Matching and Operational Models

Digital platforms have revolutionized volunteer recruitment by democratizing access and optimizing skill utilization. Below is a comparative analysis of leading virtual volunteer ecosystems, focusing on their matching algorithms, sector specialization, and impact metrics.


Platform	Primary Focus	Matching Algorithm	Key Features	Impact Metrics (2023 Data)	Funding Model
United Nations Volunteers Online (UNV)	SDG-aligned projects (e.g., climate, gender, poverty)	Hybrid AI-human review: Step 1: Volunteer submits skills profile (e.g., "graphic design," "project management"). Step 2: AI cross-references with UN agency project databases (e.g., UNDP’s Accelerator Labs). Step 3: Human curator validates cultural fit and language proficiency.	Sector-specific portals (e.g., UNV’s "Volunteer for Gender Equality"). Micro-volunteering (tasks <2 hours, e.g., translating UN reports). Blockchain verification for volunteer hours (piloted in Ethiopia).	120,000+ online volunteers in 2023. 65% retention rate for long-term assignments. $2.1M saved in operational costs via remote contributions (UNV 2023).	UN funding + corporate sponsors (e.g., Salesforce’s non-profit grants).
Catchafire	Corporate pro bono projects (e.g., marketing, IT, legal)	Skill-based bidding: Volunteers bid on projects with estimated time commitments (e.g., "I’ll design a logo in 10 hours"). Algorithm ranks bids by relevance, past reviews, and project urgency.	Corporate matching: Companies like Deloitte allocate employee volunteer hours via the platform. Project templates: Pre-built frameworks for nonprofits (e.g., "Website Redesign Kit"). AI-driven insights: Tracks ROI for nonprofits (e.g., "Your volunteer team saved $45K in ad spend").	100,000+ volunteers in 2023. Impact and Measurable Outcomes of Volunteering Volunteering generates quantifiable benefits for individuals, communities, and organizations, extending beyond altruism to measurable improvements in health, career trajectories, and societal well-being. Research demonstrates that volunteer engagement correlates with enhanced physical and mental health, skill development, and economic value creation, while organizations leverage structured metrics—such as Social Return on Investment (SROI)—to assess effectiveness. This section explores the empirical evidence of volunteering’s impact, methodologies for tracking contributions, and comparisons between tangible and intangible outcomes, supported by data-driven frameworks and real-world applications. Quantifiable Benefits of Volunteering for Individuals Studies indicate that volunteering yields statistically significant improvements in personal well-being, professional growth, and longevity. According to a 2018 meta-analysis published in BMC Public Health, individuals who volunteer regularly exhibit a 20% reduction in mortality risk compared to non-volunteers, alongside lower rates of depression and improved cardiovascular health. The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) reports that volunteers are 40% more likely to report high levels of life satisfaction and 51% more likely to experience lower blood pressure than non-volunteers. Career Advancement and Skill Development Volunteering enhances employability by fostering transferable skills, such as leadership, project management, and technical competencies. A 2020 study by Deloitte found that 73% of employers view volunteer experience as valuable for hiring, particularly in sectors like nonprofit management and corporate social responsibility. Additionally, the American Psychological Association (APA) highlights that 65% of volunteers report skill development, with 44% gaining certifications (e.g., teaching, healthcare support) through structured programs. Economic Value of Volunteer Time The economic contribution of volunteers is substantial. In the U.S., the Independent Sector estimates that 6.9 billion hours of volunteer service were logged in 2022, valued at $192 billion based on the hourly wage rate of $27.80. Similarly, the UK’s National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) calculates that volunteers save public services £24 billion annually by reducing demand for paid services. Measuring Volunteer Contributions: Social Return on Investment (SROI) Social Return on Investment (SROI) quantifies the economic and social value generated by volunteer efforts relative to the resources invested. This framework, developed by ROI Institute, assigns monetary values to non-financial outcomes (e.g., improved education, reduced crime) to demonstrate cost-effectiveness. Key metrics include: Hours logged: Total volunteer time converted to economic value (e.g., 1,000 hours × $25/hour = $25,000). Outcome metrics: Changes in community indicators (e.g., literacy rates, housing stability) attributed to volunteer interventions. Cost-benefit ratios: Comparison of volunteer-generated savings to program costs (e.g., a mentoring program reducing youth incarceration by 30% may justify a 5:1 SROI). Example: SROI in Education A 2019 study by the University of Pennsylvania analyzed a tutoring program where volunteers contributed 1,500 hours annually, improving student test scores by 15%. The SROI calculation revealed that for every $1 invested in the program, the community gained $3.50 in long-term economic benefits (e.g., higher earning potential for students). Challenges in SROI Measurement Attribution: Difficulty isolating volunteer impact from other factors (e.g., policy changes). Data availability: Limited longitudinal studies in low-resource settings. Subjectivity: Valuing intangible benefits (e.g., emotional well-being) requires qualitative adjustments. Tangible vs. Intangible Impacts of Volunteering Volunteering produces outcomes that vary in measurability and longevity. Below is a comparative analysis of tangible (direct, quantifiable) and intangible (indirect, qualitative) impacts, including their advantages and limitations. Tangible Impacts Intangible Impacts Examples: Building a school, distributing food supplies, repairing infrastructure. Pros: Quantifiable outcomes (e.g., "500 meals served," "1 school constructed"). Easier to secure funding and stakeholder buy-in. Direct correlation to organizational mission (e.g., poverty alleviation). Cons: Limited long-term sustainability without follow-up programs. May overlook systemic issues (e.g., addressing hunger without policy change). Resource-intensive to track (e.g., material costs, labor hours). Examples: Mentoring youth, providing emotional support, fostering community networks. Pros: Holistic development of individuals (e.g., improved self-esteem, social skills). Scalable through peer-to-peer models (e.g., volunteer-led support groups). Enhances community cohesion and resilience. Cons: Difficult to measure (e.g., "increased hope" lacks metric standards). Requires qualitative data collection (e.g., surveys, interviews). Longer timeframes to observe impact (e.g., years for youth mentoring outcomes). Balancing Both Impacts Organizations often combine metrics to provide a comprehensive view. For example: Habitat for Humanity tracks tangible outcomes (e.g., "100 homes built") alongside intangible benefits (e.g., "90% of families report improved mental health"). Big Brothers Big Sisters uses SROI to show that for every $1 spent on mentoring, the community gains $13 in long-term benefits, including reduced crime and higher education attainment. Data Tracking and Volunteer Management Software Volunteer management systems (VMS) enable organizations to collect, analyze, and report impact data systematically. These platforms integrate tools such as: Time-tracking: Logs hours spent on tasks (e.g., VolunteerMatch, Better Impact). Skill inventories: Matches volunteers to roles based on competencies (e.g., Idealist). Outcome dashboards: Visualizes progress toward goals (e.g., Bloomerang, Kindful). Case Study: American Red Cross The Red Cross uses VMS to track 900,000+ annual volunteer hours, generating reports for donors that include: Quantitative data: "12,000 disaster responses supported by volunteers in 2023." Qualitative stories: Testimonials from beneficiaries (e.g., "Volunteer X helped me recover after a flood"). Cost savings: "$4.2 million in reduced operational expenses" due to volunteer labor. Key Features of Effective VMS Automated reporting: Generates customizable impact reports for stakeholders. Integration with CRM systems: Links volunteer data to donor communications (e.g., Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud). Mobile accessibility: Enables real-time logging via apps (e.g., Zoho Creator). Limitations Data silos: Disconnected systems may lead to incomplete records. Over-reliance on metrics: Risk of prioritizing quantifiable tasks over strategic initiatives. Privacy concerns: Handling sensitive beneficiary data requires compliance with GDPR or FERPA. Template for a Volunteer Impact Report Organizations can structure impact reports to highlight both quantitative achievements and qualitative narratives. Below is a modular template adaptable to sector-specific needs: Title: [Organization Name] Annual Volunteer Impact Report – [Year] Subtitle: [Brief mission statement, e.g., "Empowering Communities Through Service"] ### Section 1: Executive Summary Total volunteer hours logged: [X hours] (Economic value: $X based on hourly wage rate). Key achievements: Top 3 quantifiable outcomes (e Volunteering emerges as a dynamic force that bridges individual action and collective impact, revealing how purpose-driven engagement can reshape communities, economies, and even global policies. Its adaptability—from grassroots initiatives to large-scale international efforts—demonstrates resilience in addressing challenges ranging from poverty to climate change, while technological advancements continue to redefine participation barriers. The interplay of psychological motivations, organizational structures, and measurable outcomes underscores its dual role: as a personal journey of growth and a scalable solution to societal gaps. As societies evolve, so too must the frameworks supporting volunteerism, ensuring its sustainability aligns with the evolving needs of both participants and the causes they champion. FAQ what is volunteering leave? Q: What exactly does "volunteering leave" mean in a workplace? what is volunteering work? Q: What is volunteering work, and how is it different from regular employment? what is volunteering mean? Q: What does volunteering mean in simple terms? what is volunteering experience? Q: What is volunteering experience, and why do employers value it? what is volunteering at the olympics like? Q: What is volunteering at the Olympics like? what is volunteering taxpayer? Q: What is volunteering, and how does it relate to taxpayers? altruism-studies civic-engagement community-development nonprofit-sector social-impact Leave a Comment Name Comment Post Comment Comments are moderated before appearing. The data you submit is processed according to the Privacy Policy of Voltefac.