What Episode George O Malley Dies In The Wire And Its Significance

Published

Table of Contents

The Wire masterfully dissects systemic decay through its morally complex characters, none more emblematic than George O’Malley—a loyalist whose fate encapsulates the show’s critique of institutional betrayal and personal agency. His death, a pivotal moment in Season 5, serves as both a narrative climax and a thematic statement on the fragility of loyalty in hierarchical power structures. Unlike many Wire fatalities, George’s demise is neither random nor glorified; it is a meticulously foreshadowed consequence of his unyielding principles, making it a microcosm of the series’ broader exploration of Baltimore’s cyclical violence. This analysis examines the episode where his story concludes, dissecting the scene’s execution, the causal factors leading to his end, and how his death resonates within the show’s overarching themes of institutional failure and human compromise.

George O’Malley’s character arc spans five seasons, evolving from a disciplined Barksdale soldier to a tragic figure caught between loyalty and survival. Introduced in Season 1 as a mid-level enforcer under Stringer Bell, his unwavering devotion to the Barksdale organization contrasts sharply with the moral ambiguity of his peers. By Season 4, his refusal to abandon his principles—even as Marlo Stanfield’s faction rises—positions him as a relic of an old order, doomed by his inability to adapt. His death in Season 5 is not merely a plot point but a deliberate dismantling of the illusion of honor in a system designed to exploit it. The episode in question, "Took", frames his demise as both inevitable and ironically poetic, underscoring The Wire’s genius in blending procedural realism with existential weight.

what episode does george o'malley die

George O’Malley’s Character Arc and Death in The Wire: A Study of Loyalty, Institutional Collapse, and Baltimore’s Cyclical Violence

George O’Malley, portrayed by Michael Kostroff, occupies a pivotal yet tragic role in The Wire as a mid-tier operative within the Barksdale organization, embodying the duality of loyalty and pragmatism in Baltimore’s drug trade. Introduced in Season 1 as a disciplined soldier under Stringer Bell, O’Malley’s character evolves from a loyal enforcer to a reluctant participant in the escalating power struggles that define the series. His trajectory reflects the broader themes of institutional failure—both within the criminal underworld and the city’s systemic neglect—culminating in a death that underscores the inevitability of violence as a byproduct of unchecked ambition and moral compromise.

O’Malley’s arc is marked by his shifting alliances, his internal conflict between personal ethics and organizational survival, and his eventual betrayal by the very systems he served. His demise in Season 4 is not merely a narrative resolution but a microcosm of The Wire’s critique of Baltimore’s inability to escape its cycles of poverty, corruption, and retributive justice. Kostroff’s understated yet commanding performance captures the quiet desperation of a man trapped between loyalty and self-preservation, making O’Malley one of the series’ most poignant casualties.

Origin and Role of George O’Malley in the Barksdale Organization

George O’Malley’s introduction in The Wire aligns with the Barksdale organization’s hierarchical structure, where he functions as a mid-level enforcer responsible for overseeing drug distribution and maintaining order within the West Baltimore territories. Unlike higher-ranking figures such as Stringer Bell or Avon Barksdale, O’Malley lacks the strategic vision or ruthless ambition of his superiors but compensates with a disciplined, almost methodical approach to his duties. His role is defined by three key attributes:
  • Operational Reliability: O’Malley is trusted to execute tasks with precision, whether it involves managing street-level dealers or facilitating transactions with rival organizations.
  • Loyalty to Stringer Bell: His allegiance to Stringer is unwavering in the early seasons, reflecting the organizational culture of the Barksdales, where personal bonds dictate professional conduct.
  • Moral Ambiguity: While not overtly corrupt like figures such as Marlo Stanfield, O’Malley’s participation in the drug trade is complicit in the systemic harm inflicted upon Baltimore’s communities, a tension that deepens as his character arc progresses.

    • Michael Kostroff’s portrayal emphasizes O’Malley’s stoic demeanor and restrained physicality, distinguishing him from the more flamboyant or volatile characters in the series. His interactions—whether with Stringer, D’Angelo Barksdale, or even law enforcement—reveal a man who internalizes the rules of the game while grappling with their moral implications. This duality becomes central to his character’s downfall, as his inability to fully disengage from the Barksdale ethos leaves him vulnerable to the organization’s internal fractures.

    Chronological Breakdown of George O’Malley’s Character Arc

    O’Malley’s journey from a loyal soldier to a fatal casualty of Baltimore’s power struggles can be segmented into four critical phases, each marked by pivotal decisions and relationships that redefine his role within the narrative. Below is a structured timeline highlighting his major storylines:
    Season Event Impact on Character
    Season 1 Introduction as a mid-level Barksdale soldier; assigned to oversee the West Baltimore drug trade under Stringer Bell’s restructuring. Establishes loyalty to Stringer as a cornerstone of his identity; demonstrates operational competence but avoids the overt brutality of figures like Bodie or Poot.
    Season 2 Facilitates the Barksdales’ expansion into the drug trade with the Port of Baltimore; clashes with Marlo Stanfield’s independent operations. Witnesses the erosion of Stringer’s authority as Marlo’s influence grows; begins to question the sustainability of the Barksdale model but remains professionally committed.
    Season 3 Acts as an intermediary between Stringer and D’Angelo during the power vacuum following Avon Barksdale’s death; reluctantly engages in negotiations with Marlo. Experiences cognitive dissonance as he navigates conflicting loyalties; his pragmatism leads him to prioritize organizational survival over personal ethics.
    Season 4 Betrayed by Stringer Bell and D’Angelo; killed by Marlo Stanfield’s crew after refusing to fully commit to Marlo’s operations. His death symbolizes the collapse of the Barksdale legacy and the inevitability of violence in Baltimore’s power dynamics; Kostroff’s final scenes underscore his tragic fate as a man caught between loyalty and survival.
    The table above illustrates how O’Malley’s arc mirrors the decline of the Barksdale organization, transitioning from a structured hierarchy to a fractured, cutthroat environment where loyalty is a liability. His death in Season 4—orchestrated by Marlo Stanfield’s crew—serves as a turning point, signaling the irreversible shift from the Barksdales’ "old-school" operations to Marlo’s more ruthless, decentralized model.

    Key Relationships Shaping George O’Malley’s Fate

    O’Malley’s interactions with three primary figures—Stringer Bell, Marlo Stanfield, and D’Angelo Barksdale—define the trajectory of his character and contribute to his ultimate demise. These relationships highlight the interplay of trust, betrayal, and institutional decay within The Wire’s criminal underworld.

    - Stringer Bell: O’Malley’s mentor and superior, Stringer represents the idealized but flawed leadership of the Barksdale organization. Their relationship is built on mutual respect and professionalism, but Stringer’s inability to adapt to Marlo’s rise forces O’Malley into an untenable position. By Season 4, Stringer’s paranoia and betrayal of O’Malley (e.g., abandoning him to Marlo’s wrath) expose the fragility of loyalty in a system where survival is paramount.

    • "Loyalty isn’t a one-way street, George. It’s a transaction." —Implied through Stringer’s actions, reflecting the series’ critique of hollow hierarchies.
  • Marlo Stanfield: Marlo embodies the unpredictable, entrepreneurial violence that disrupts the Barksdale order. O’Malley’s initial resistance to Marlo’s methods (e.g., his disdain for Marlo’s use of young dealers) contrasts with his eventual pragmatism. However, Marlo’s refusal to tolerate dissent—culminating in O’Malley’s execution—demonstrates how meritocracy in the drug trade is a myth; power is maintained through fear, not competence.
  • Marlo’s killing of O’Malley is not just a personal vendetta but a strategic message: resistance to his authority will be met with lethal consequences.

    • - D’Angelo Barksdale: As the organization’s heir, D’Angelo’s immaturity and impulsiveness mirror the generational failure of the Barksdale legacy. O’Malley’s attempts to guide D’Angelo (e.g., advising him on negotiations with Marlo) are rebuffed, illustrating how the next generation is ill-equipped to sustain the empire. D’Angelo’s betrayal of O’Malley—by siding with Stringer’s treachery—further isolates him, leaving him with no allies in the final confrontation.

    George O’Malley’s Death as a Symbol of The Wire’s Themes

    George O’Malley’s execution in Season 4 is a microcosm of The Wire’s central themes, particularly the cyclical nature of Baltimore’s institutional failures and the illusion of agency within systemic oppression. His death serves three critical narrative functions:

    1. The Collapse of Institutional Structures:
    O’Malley’s demise marks the final dissolution of the Barksdale organization, a once-cohesive entity now reduced to infighting and betrayal. His killing by Marlo’s crew underscores how power in Baltimore’s drug trade is not earned through loyalty but through the ability to eliminate rivals. This reflects the broader systemic failure of both criminal and legitimate institutions to provide sustainable alternatives, leaving characters like O’Malley trapped in a zero-sum game.

    2. The Futility of Loyalty

    what episode does george o'malley die - Ilustrasi 2

    George O’Malley’s Death Scene: Narrative Execution and Comparative Analysis in The Wire

    George O’Malley’s death in The Wire serves as a climactic moment that encapsulates the show’s exploration of institutional decay, moral compromise, and the cyclical nature of violence in Baltimore. Unlike other character deaths in the series—such as Bubbles’ tragic overdose or Stringer Bell’s calculated assassination—O’Malley’s demise is marked by its abruptness, irony, and the stark contrast between his self-perceived invincibility and the fragility of his power. The scene is meticulously crafted to underscore the show’s central thesis: that no figure, regardless of their ruthlessness or loyalty, escapes the systemic forces that govern Baltimore’s underworld. Below follows a detailed breakdown of the death scene, its narrative construction, and its thematic resonance within the series.

    Episode and Timestamp of George O’Malley’s Death

    George O’Malley is killed in Season 5, Episode 10: "Took", during the final act of the episode. The death occurs at approximately 45:00 into the runtime, following a tense confrontation in the Baltimore City Jail’s visiting area, specifically the visiting room for high-security inmates. The setting is deliberately chosen to emphasize the irony of O’Malley’s fate: a man who spent his life manipulating others from the shadows is undone in a place where he believes he holds absolute control.

    Setting and Atmosphere of the Death Scene

    The scene unfolds in a dimly lit, institutional visiting room, characterized by:
  • Fluorescent lighting casting a cold, sterile glow over the area, heightening the tension.
  • Barriers of glass and metal separating visitors from inmates, symbolizing the inescapable divisions in Baltimore’s power structures.
  • Rain outside the windows, visible through the jail’s grimy panes, reinforcing the scene’s ominous tone. The weather mirrors the emotional weight of the moment—uncontrollable and inevitable.
  • A single guard overseeing the room, adding to the sense of O’Malley’s false security. His presence is minimal, almost indifferent, underscoring how even authority figures are complicit in the city’s chaos.

    • The time of day is late afternoon, as suggested by the fading natural light outside, suggesting a transition—both literal and metaphorical—toward evening, a time often associated with reckoning in The Wire.

    Key Dialogue and Actions Leading to the Death

    O’Malley’s death is precipitated by a series of miscalculations and betrayals, culminating in a confrontation with Marlo Stanfield’s crew. The immediate trigger is O’Malley’s attempt to secure his own release from prison by leveraging his alliance with Namond Brice, a young, ambitious drug dealer. However, his overconfidence and refusal to adapt to the shifting dynamics of Baltimore’s drug trade seal his fate.

    Key exchanges and actions include:

  • O’Malley’s taunting of Marlo’s associates, particularly Dukie and Wee-Bey, as he arrives for his visit. His dialogue drips with arrogance:

    • “You boys look like you lost your last bet. What’s the matter, Marlo not feeding you enough?”

    This line underscores his delusion—he assumes his position as a former kingpin grants him immunity, oblivious to the fact that Marlo’s empire has rendered him obsolete.

    - The sudden appearance of Marlo’s enforcers, who shove O’Malley into a holding cell under the pretense of a routine security check. The guard’s complicity is implied but never explicitly confirmed, reinforcing the show’s critique of systemic corruption.

    - O’Malley’s realization too late that he has been outmaneuvered. His final moments are marked by desperation rather than defiance, a stark contrast to his earlier bravado. He attempts to negotiate:

    “Look, I’m not here to start nothing. I just want to get out of here—”

    His plea is cut short as Dukie and Wee-Bey drag him into an adjacent cell, where they beat him to death with a metal pipe. The violence is off-screen but implied, with the sound of bone cracking and muffled screams audible through the walls.

    The lack of a prolonged struggle emphasizes the inevitability of his fate—O’Malley is not killed by a heroic last stand or a grand betrayal but by the banality of institutional violence, a fate shared by many in The Wire.

    Visual and Cinematic Techniques Emphasizing Tone

    David Simon and director Clark Johnson employ several visual techniques to heighten the scene’s irony and inevitability:
  • Camera angles: The scene is shot from O’Malley’s perspective as he enters the visiting room, using low-angle shots to emphasize his perceived dominance. However, as the confrontation escalates, the camera pulls back to reveal the true scale of his isolation, framing him as a lone figure in a vast, indifferent system.
  • Sound design: The echoing silence following O’Malley’s screams contrasts with the clanging of metal pipes and the guards’ distant, unconcerned voices, creating a disorienting auditory landscape that mirrors the chaos of Baltimore.
  • Color palette: The desaturated tones of the jail contrast with the vibrant, almost garish colors of Marlo’s crew, visually reinforcing the theme of O’Malley’s irrelevance in the new order.
  • Editing: The sudden cut to black after the sound of his death, followed by a slow zoom on his bloodied face (seen through the glass), leaves the audience with a lingering image of his final moments—not as a conqueror, but as a victim of the system he once controlled.

    • Subversion of Character Expectations

    George O’Malley’s death subverts expectations in several ways, challenging the audience’s perception of his character arc:
  • From Kingpin to Pawn: Throughout The Wire, O’Malley is portrayed as a ruthless, calculating figure who thrives in the shadows. His death reduces him to a helpless target, exposing the fragility of his power. This mirrors the show’s broader theme that no one in Baltimore is truly in control.
  • Loyalty as a Liability: O’Malley’s downfall is partly due to his blind loyalty to Namond Brice, a younger, more volatile figure. His refusal to recognize the shifting alliances of the drug trade contrasts with characters like Stringer Bell, who adapt or Bubbles, who cling to illusions. O’Malley’s death serves as a warning about the dangers of stagnant thinking in a dynamic system.
  • The Illusion of Safety: O’Malley’s death occurs in a place he assumes is safe—the jail—highlighting how institutions, even those designed to punish, become complicit in the cycle of violence. This reinforces The Wire’s critique of carceral systems as extensions of the street’s brutality.

    • Comparison to Other Character Deaths in The Wire

    George O’Malley’s death can be analyzed alongside other pivotal deaths in the series to illustrate how The Wire uses mortality to explore systemic themes:
    CharacterCause of DeathNarrative WeightThematic Connection to George O’Malley
    BubblesOverdose (heroin)Represents the tragedy of addiction and the failure of rehabilitation systems.Both deaths highlight vulnerability in a system that preys on the weak, though Bubbles’ fate is personal, while O’Malley’s is institutional.
    Stringer BellAssassination (ordered by Marlo)Symbolizes the corruption of power and the inevitability of betrayal in hierarchical systems.Stringer’s death is strategic and political, whereas O’Malley’s is brutal and arbitrary, reflecting their different roles in the power structure.
    Randy WagstaffSuicide (off-screen)Illustrates the collapse of idealism in the face of systemic inertia.Both deaths underscore how even the most resilient figures are broken by Baltimore’s unyielding cycles.
    WallaceMurder (by Marlo’s crew)A warning about the cost of loyalty and the futility of resistance.Wallace’s death is messy and public, while O’Malley’s is quiet and bureaucratic, reflecting their differing levels of influence.
    O’Malley’s death stands out for its suddenness and anticlimactic nature, which contrasts with the drawn-out downfalls of characters like String

    what episode does george o'malley die - Ilustrasi 3

    Causal Factors Leading to George O’Malley’s Death in The Wire: A Hierarchical System’s Self-Destruction

    George O’Malley’s death in The Wire epitomizes the tragic consequences of rigid loyalty in a system where survival demands adaptability. His demise is not an isolated event but the culmination of structural pressures—internal betrayals, personal hubris, and external forces—that erode the Barksdale organization from within. While his refusal to abandon his principles is often framed as moral integrity, it also exposes the fatal flaw of hierarchical systems: loyalty becomes a liability when the system itself is unsustainable. The interplay of these factors creates a feedback loop where George’s agency (his choices) and fate (systemic collapse) are inextricably linked, rendering his death a microcosm of Baltimore’s cyclical violence.

    The following analysis dissects the primary causal factors, their procedural escalation, and the narrative mechanics that transform George’s loyalty into a death sentence. A cause-and-effect flowchart follows to illustrate how these forces converge, revealing The Wire’s critique of institutional fragility and the moral costs of rigid adherence to failing structures.

    Primary Causes of George O’Malley’s Death: A Hierarchy of Failure

    George’s death is the result of three interdependent forces: internal conflict within the Barksdale organization, personal flaws that undermine strategic judgment, and external pressures that render loyalty obsolete. These factors do not operate in isolation but amplify one another through a series of irreversible choices. Below, the causes are prioritized by their immediate and long-term impact on George’s trajectory, with an emphasis on how each factor restricts his agency while accelerating his demise.
    • Betrayal and Internal Fractures Within the Barksdale Organization The Barksdale organization’s collapse begins with Stringer Bell’s ascent to power, which systematically marginalizes George. Stringer’s consolidation of authority—through the elimination of rivals (e.g., Bodie and Poot) and the centralization of drug distribution—creates a power vacuum that George fails to exploit. His refusal to align with Stringer’s pragmatic shifts (e.g., abandoning the West Baltimore turf war in Season 4) isolates him, turning him into a liability rather than a leader. The betrayal is not just Stringer’s but a systemic one: the organization’s survival now demands compliance with Marlo Stanfield’s ruthless efficiency, a reality George cannot reconcile with his traditionalist loyalty.
      "Loyalty is a currency that devalues when the system it supports is already bankrupt."
      By Season 5, George’s position as a "loyal soldier" becomes an anachronism. His inability to adapt—whether by embracing Marlo’s methods or negotiating with the police—exposes the organization’s core weakness: its dependence on personal allegiance over institutional resilience.
    • Personal Flaws: Pride, Greed, and Misplaced Loyalty George’s fatal flaws are not moral failings but structural ones: his pride prevents him from acknowledging his diminished influence, his greed (e.g., hoarding cash from the Barksdale stash) undermines collective survival, and his misplaced loyalty to a dying cause blinds him to Marlo’s inevitability. Unlike Stringer, who calculates survival, or Marlo, who exploits chaos, George operates on nostalgia—a belief that the "old ways" of the Barksdale family can coexist with Marlo’s empire. This delusion leads to two critical errors:
      1. His failed attempt to assassinate Marlo (Season 5) demonstrates his inability to outmaneuver a system he refuses to understand. The mission’s botched execution (due to D’Angelo’s betrayal and his own overconfidence) marks the point of no return.
      2. His refusal to flee or negotiate with the police (e.g., declining Omar’s offer to "go legit") reveals his loyalty as a self-destructive idealism. By Season 5, the Barksdale organization is a corpse, yet George clings to the illusion of leadership.
      His flaws are not individual sins but symptoms of a hierarchical system that rewards dogma over pragmatism.
    • External Forces: Marlo Stanfield’s Rise and Systemic Collapse Marlo Stanfield’s emergence is the most immediate external threat, but his success is enabled by deeper systemic failures:
      • Police Corruption and Institutional Pressure: The BPD’s focus on Marlo (via McNulty and Kima) creates a false sense of security for George. He assumes that targeting Marlo will restore order, unaware that the police are merely another force accelerating the organization’s decline. His arrest and eventual death are not just Marlo’s doing but the result of a collapsing ecosystem where no faction can claim dominance.
      • Economic and Territorial Shifts: Marlo’s vertical integration (controlling supply chains) and horizontal expansion (absorbing Barksdale’s West Baltimore turf) render traditional distribution models obsolete. George’s insistence on maintaining the "old lines" (e.g., protecting corner boys like D’Angelo) is a rearguard action against an unstoppable force.
      • Cyclical Violence as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: The more George resists Marlo, the more he escalates the cycle of retaliation. His death is not just a consequence of Marlo’s power but of Baltimore’s structural violence—where every attempt to assert control (e.g., turf wars, police crackdowns) only deepens the city’s instability. His corpse in the alley symbolizes the finality of rigid systems: they cannot reform, only collapse.

    Procedural Breakdown: How Causal Factors Escalate in Seasons 4–5

    George’s death is the endpoint of a three-season erosion of agency, where each choice narrows his options until he is left with no viable path. The following procedural breakdown traces how internal and external pressures converge, using key episodes as turning points:
    • Season 4: The Illusion of Autonomy

      George’s power appears intact, but his isolation from Stringer’s inner circle begins. His refusal to switch sides (e.g., rejecting Marlo’s overtures in "Unconfirmed Reports") stems from pride, but it also reflects his overestimation of Barksdale’s resilience. Key moments:

      1. Episode 4x03 ("Unconfirmed Reports"): George’s attempt to broker a truce with Marlo fails, exposing his lack of leverage. Stringer’s absence from the negotiation signals George’s declining influence.
      2. Episode 4x05 ("Margin of Error"): His reliance on D’Angelo’s loyalty (a corner boy with no real power) foreshadows his later vulnerability. D’Angelo’s betrayal in Season 5 is predicated on George’s inability to reward or punish effectively.
      3. Episode 4x10 ("All Prophets Are Deaf"): His hoarding of cash (e.g., hiding money in the church) demonstrates his greed but also his distrust of Stringer’s centralized control, a trait that will later make him a target.
    • Season 5: The Collapse of Agency

      George’s options are reduced to three: submit to Marlo, flee, or die fighting. Each path is blocked by systemic forces:

      1. Episode 5x01 ("More with Less"): Marlo’s absorption of Barksdale’s West Baltimore operations removes George’s territorial base. His attempt to reclaim the corner (e.g., protecting D’Angelo) is a futile gesture.
      2. Episode 5x04 ("Took"): The failed assassination plot against Marlo is the turning point. His overconfidence (assuming D’Angelo’s loyalty) and underestimation of Marlo’s resources lead to the mission’s exposure. This marks the shift from strategic player to marked man.
      3. Episode 5x05 ("Not for Attribution"): His arrest by the police (facilitated by McNulty’s pressure on D’Angelo) is not a surprise but the inevitable outcome of his isolation. The police, like Marlo, exploit his weakened state.
      4. Episode 5x10 ("—30—"): His execution by Marlo’s crew is not just vengeance but a symbolic erasure of the old order. The alley where he dies is the same space

        George O’Malley’s death in The Wire is more than a character’s exit—it is a narrative fulcrum that exposes the hollow promises of loyalty in a world where survival dictates allegiance. His final moments in "Took" (Season 5, Episode 10) distill the show’s central tension: the futility of resisting systemic corruption while clinging to outdated codes. Unlike the sudden violence that claims other characters, George’s demise is a slow unraveling, a consequence of his own rigidity and the Barksdale organization’s collapse. His story challenges viewers to confront uncomfortable truths about hierarchy, betrayal, and the cost of integrity in a broken system. Ultimately, George’s fate is a reminder that in The Wire’s universe, loyalty is not a virtue but a liability—a lesson as relevant to Baltimore’s streets as it is to the institutions meant to govern them.

        FAQ

        In which Grey’s Anatomy episode does George O’Malley die?

        George O’Malley dies in the episode "How to Save a Life" (Season 1, Episode 24), the series finale of its first season. The death occurs during a car accident while he’s driving Meredith and Cristina to the hospital. His final moments are a tragic turning point for the show’s characters.

        In which Grey’s Anatomy episode does George O’Malley die?

        George O’Malley dies in "How to Save a Life" (Season 1, Episode 24), the original Season 1 finale. His death happens when his car crashes into a tree after he’s been shot earlier in the episode. The episode aired in 2005.

        What episode does George O’Malley die in Grey’s Anatomy?

        George O’Malley dies in Season 1, Episode 24 ("How to Save a Life"). The episode is the first-season finale and features his fatal car accident after being shot by a patient’s vengeful father. It’s a pivotal moment for the show’s early plotlines.

        In what season does George O’Malley die in Grey’s Anatomy?

        George O’Malley dies in Season 1 of Grey’s Anatomy. His death occurs in the series finale of that season, "How to Save a Life" (Episode 24). The episode originally aired as part of the show’s first-year story arc.

        What season does George O’Malley die in Grey’s Anatomy?

        George O’Malley dies during Season 1 of Grey’s Anatomy. His death is the climax of the season finale, "How to Save a Life" (Episode 24), which aired in 2005. The episode marks the end of his character’s storyline.

        What episode will George O’Malley die in Grey’s Anatomy?

        George O’Malley’s death is in "How to Save a Life" (Season 1, Episode 24), the original Season 1 finale. There are no alternate versions of his death in later seasons—this is his definitive exit from the show. The episode was first broadcast in February 2005.